World Earth Day 2024

World Earth Day 2024

Every year on 22nd April the world unites to recognise the beauty of our planet and, most importantly, the increasing need to protect it. First held in 1970, Earth Day now includes 1 billion people in more than 193 countries! 

At THE PACK, we know that it’s not only people that can help save the earth, just as it’s not only people who have an environmental footprint. Our four-legged friends have a huge role to play too, given that the pet food industry produces almost 3% of the total carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions from farming. To put that into the context, this is the same amount of CO2 produced by a sixth of global flights. Staying on the transport theme, feeding dogs and cats in America alone has been calculated to be as environmentally damaging as pumping the exhaust of nearly 14 million cars into the atmosphere for a year. 

Why Is Commercial 'Pet' Food Hurting The Earth?

It’s simple: because the majority is meat. Numerous scientific papers, including the most recent IPCC report which summarises reports published over the past five years, have found animal agriculture to be responsible for anything from a third to 87% of annual greenhouse gas emissions as well as the primary driver of biodiversity loss. As more of us choose to feed ‘human grade’ meat to our dogs, animals are being bred and slaughtered specifically for pet food - which means meaty dog foods are now a major player in climate change. 

The 2023 IPCC report states that we need to flip our current animal-based food and land use systems to be carbon sinks (absorbing carbon from the atmosphere) instead of carbon emitters, while still meeting global demand for food. How do we make this happen? We switch to plant-based alternatives of course. Plant-sourced food needs far fewer natural resources to produce and creates lower greenhouse gas emissions. Currently, a third of all calories in the crops we grow are fed to animals we farm, with only 12% or less of those calories being reused by humans when we eat meat, eggs and dairy. That’s an enormous waste. If we stopped growing plants to feed farm animals and instead grew pulses, fruits and vegetables for ourselves and our furry families, we could feed an extra 350 million people, and a whole lot of dogs too!

Because this plant-based switch has to include pet food. The environmental pawprint of a 70-pound golden retriever eating a raw meat diet is almost twice that of an average meat-eating human. When you consider that most dogs eat meat at least twice a day, every day, this isn’t such a surprise. But this Earth Day, we need to acknowledge that a) this isn’t sustainable and b) there are better ways to feed our furry friends. 

Can Vegan Dogs Save The Planet? 

Last year a groundbreaking scientific paper by Professor Andrew Knight on The Environmental Sustainability Benefits Of Vegan Dog, Cat and Human Diets was published in prestigious journal PLoS One, revealing the relative benefits for environmental sustainability of vegan diets for dogs, cats and people. In an exclusive interview, THE PACK picked the brains of Professor Andrew Knight on the importance of his findings and what this new data might mean for the future of plant-based dog food.

Andrew, your new research finds that:

  • Transitioning all dogs to nutritionally-sound vegan diets would spare as many as 6 billion land animals (and billions of aquatic animals) from slaughter, as well as significantly reducing land and water use, greenhouse gas emissions and biocide use.
  • You found that all dogs being 'vegan' would free up land larger than Saudi Arabia or Mexico and save freshwater volumes greater than all freshwater use in Denmark.
  • Vegan dog diets would reduce GHGs (greenhouse gases) by amounts greater than all GHG emissions from South Africa or the UK.
  • And finally, the numbers of additional people who could be fed using food energy savings associated with canine vegan diets exceeded the 2018 human populations of the entire European Union, which was over 512 million people

 

These are staggering statistics, confirming what we've always believed at THE PACK - that feeding our dogs plants instead of meat is a critically important way to save our planet and other animals. What impact do you hope this new paper will have?

I think these results are game-changing for the discussion about plant-based diets that has been prominent within society, particularly among those who care about the environmental impacts of farming. We know that the livestock sector is responsible for vast amounts of land use, deforestation, water use, water pollution, greenhouse gases and so on. In response, there have been many calls for human diet change, but virtually no calls for diet change for dogs or cats. This is partly because of the assumption that they consume relatively few livestock products, and that what they do consume is mainly by-products of human food production and is therefore beneficial ‘recycling’. But actually, what this study shows is that the only benefit of using byproducts within meat-based pet foods is that they're cheaper than human-grade meat. The actual environment impact of using by-products is greater than if pets were to be fed human-grade meat. This is because using byproducts requires more livestock animals to produce, than producing human-grade meat. It’s less efficient on a per-carcass basis.

So, the use of byproducts actually increases the ecological pawprint of pets, rather than decreasing it. These are major findings of this study: that the use of byproducts increases the environmental impact and, actually, the environmental impact of dog food is really substantial. Globally, at least 8% of livestock consumption is for dog food, so we are quite wrong to assume that we don't need think about pet food during discussions about food system change.

Feeding byproducts decreases the cost of pet food. But it lowers the quality of the ingredients these poor dogs are consuming, and it significantly worsens the environmental impacts. 

Do you think that these findings will filter down to kind of your average, environmentally conscious pawrent? Do you think that will have genuine impact in changing the way that people feed their dogs?

Yes! I very much hope that these scientific results will get widely reported to dog guardians, as well as to the veterinary and pet care industries. I will do my best to get the message out, but I very much rely upon the help of all who care about dog health and environmental sustainability, to get this key information widely disseminated. 

These results are especially exciting because this data’s relevance is no longer limited just to pet guardians; the study provides key new results about the environmental benefits of human dietary change too. That means it has wider interest; after all, everybody should be concerned about environmental sustainability and climate change, nowadays.

The study we published last year on health outcomes in dogs for vegan diets was reported in more than 400 news outlets globally. And this study has potential to be even bigger! 

It’s really important that the message does get out there. Climate change, biodiversity loss and environmental degradation are the key issues for our generation and the ones that will follow us, and this publication is key to addressing one of the major known causes, which is the livestock sector.

 

Papers have been published on environmental sustainability of plant-based pet food before, by yourself and researchers like Okin. How does this new research advance the field/show something new? What do you believe to be your most significant finding?

We have not had information about the ingredients used in pet food on a large scale until very recently, and this is the first large, published study to make use of all that data. It utilised an industry report that covered two-thirds of all pet food produced in the US in 2018 to 2019. From this detailed information about pet food ingredients I was able to calculate how much of the pet food was by-products etc., and how much wasn't, and what livestock species were being used. That allowed me to work out how many average livestock animals were required to produce all of that food for dogs, and then calculate what the environmental impact was, in comparison to livestock consumption by cats and people.

So the major advance here was the ability to analyse, in detail, the actual ingredients used in pet food, and the consequent level of consumption of livestock animals, and the resultant environmental impacts.

 

You found that, globally, dogs consume 7.7% of livestock animals compared with humans who consume 91.1%. Did this figure surprise you? Is it more or less than you expected?

I think it’s surprising to see that dogs, in particular, consume such a large bite of the ‘livestock pie’. They consume billions of livestock animals and accordingly have major ecological pawprints. The study also reviews all previous studies in this field, and several of those have shown that the dietary consumption of an average sized dog is roughly equivalent to that of an average human consumer. This does vary a lot across dog sizes (large breed dogs have much, much greater pawprints than small breeds). 

It’s important to note that I had a choice at multiple steps during the calculation process to take more or less conservative options, and I always chose the most conservative option possible. So, I think that the true environmental impacts of dog food are actually larger than those found in my results; probably substantially larger. Conversely, the benefits of transitioning them on to nutritionally-sound vegan diets, are probably much greater than shown in my study – which already shows very large benefits.

 

Why do you think major retailers aren't already stocking plant-based pet food? Will this new data help?

I think this change is coming. I believe we're at the start of an exponential growth curve for vegan pet foods. Two years ago, I had pet food startup companies coming to me about once every three months requesting a summary of the research data. Now, it's once a fortnight. The speed at which new companies are coming into this area is notable.

UK Pet Food – the trade association for nearly all UK pet food manufacturers – only recently updated their factsheet confirming that nutritionally-sound vegan pet foods are a legitimate product, and that dogs and cats can thrive on these products. The British Veterinary Association hasn't yet updated their policy of opposition to these diets, but they are reviewing all their information at the moment, in light of the wealth of recent scientific evidence showing equivalent or superior health outcomes for dogs and cats using vegan diets. Change is happening, but it’s not going to take place overnight, where all the supermarkets suddenly have good availability of these brands. In fact, I’m hearing of shortages of vegan pet food in various regions of the world, and we know that consumer convenience is a key factor in determining whether products like these succeed. It’s therefore really important that this is addressed. 

I think we’re seeing the teething problems that occur when a disruptive industry first emerges, and new products become available. There’s always a period when demand outpaces supply, and supply needs to catch up. We're going through that at the moment with vegan pet food. 

Even people who don't particularly care about animal welfare often do care about environmental sustainability. Major corporations sometimes do (as part of their corporate social responsibility policies), so this study being published and widely reported will add enormous impetus to the change that is likely to occur in this area.



What do you see as the best plant-based diet for a dog? Oven-baked, extruded, cold-pressed, wet?  Does it matter?

From an environmental perspective, it makes a really big difference. I didn't examine this in my particular study, but I did review all of the other studies on plant-based dog food. Several had calculated relative environmental impacts, and they were vastly greater for wet food than for dry food. 

Regarding the dogs consuming these diets, the important aspects are that the food is nutritionally sound, and the animal is enjoying their food. There's no evidence to indicate any widespread difference in nutritional soundness between wet and dry or differences in palatability. Sometimes there are medical conditions for which the pet needs to eat dry or wet. As a general rule, if a dog is overweight, I suggest a wet diet, because of the higher water concentration which helps to expand the stomach and make the animal feel satiated without providing calories. Whereas if there's a dental problem, generally dry biscuits or kibble may be more helpful to scrape the teeth clean.

 

Do you have any advice to pawrents wanting to feed their dogs plant-based but not sure where to start?

I always recommend people try to choose a reputable company who are working with veterinarian nutritionists or PhD nutritionists, to ensure that the product is nutritionally sound. These companies should be able to provide some kind of information about reasonable steps that they're taking to ensure nutritional soundness and good quality. If a company doesn't have any information on their website and won't respond to queries, that should be a red flag and you should go somewhere else. Of course, it's basic and essential that the product has to be labelled as being nutritionally sound: not intended as a treat or snack but rather as a complete diet. “Nutritionally complete” and “Nutritionally balanced” are both terms that indicate that. 

Here's some advice about gradual transitioning as well. Some dogs tend to eat first and ask questions later(!) but you should generally resist that and gradually change their diet over a couple of weeks. This allows more time for their digestive enzymes and bacteria in their intestines to transition, reducing the potential for adverse reactions such as diarrhoea.


You've published a series of exciting papers about vegan pet food over the last few years. Are you able to give us any hints about what you're working on next? 

Yes. I have a series of exciting studies coming, examining aspects such as canine health outcomes, economic impacts for pet guardians of lowered medication use and veterinary visits, and other aspects. I’ll continue to post study summaries once published on www.sustainablepetfood.info and my social media. 

How Are THE PACK Doing Things Differently? 

If we want to feed our dogs sustainable pet food, that food needs to be as low as possible on the food chain. Going straight to the calorie source – plants – reduces environmental damage at the same time as improving health. According to the calculations of animal nutritionists, if you’re already vegan and you switch your 70-pound retriever to a plant-based diet, together you could save, every day: 2,200 gallons of water, about 60 square feet of rainforest, about 90 pounds of grain and two farmed animals’ lives.

At THE PACK, we’re investing in our planet every day by reducing carbon pawprints through the plant-based food we create and reducing carbon footprints through our sustainable packaging and production methods. 

Using secondary data, we conducted extensive life cycle analysis (from farm to dog) of carbon dioxide equivalent (CO2e) emissions for all three flavours of our wet food versus beef, chicken and farm-based fish equivalents. Our results were even more dramatic than we expected! 

  • The analysis showed that for ingredients used, a beef-based dog food produces 17.5 times as much CO2e as No Moo Ragu. This equates to a huge increase in use of water and land: 10 times as much water is used to produce 1kg beef in comparison with plant-based protein, while 80 times as much land is used to produce 1kg of protein from beef in comparison with 1kg of plant-based protein! 
  • A farmed fish-based dog food produces over six times as much CO2e as No Fishy Dishy (three times as much land is used to produce 1kg of protein from farmed fish in comparison with 1kg of plant-based protein) and a chicken-based dog food produces nearly seven times as much CO2e as No Cluck Casserole. The latter equates to a 5x increase in the use of water and 4.4x increase in use of land.
  • Thinking about this in terms of CO2e savings, purchasing one can of No Moo Ragu instead of a can of beefy dog food would save 3.28kg CO2e. Depending on your personal vice, this equates to over 11 cups of espresso, over 10 pints of locally produced cask ale or driving for 16.4 km in a new car!
  • No Fishy Dishy production saves 1.06 kg CO2e, the same as more than three pints of ale. As for No Cluck Casserole production – that saves 1.15 kg CO2e, the same as more than four cups of espresso or driving for 5.75 km in a new car. 

Remember, all these stats are just for one can. Imagine how much CO2e is being wasted when you buy meaty dog food for a year… and how much can be saved when you switch to plant-based alternatives!

What Are THE PACK Doing Next?

Firstly, we want to redo the analysis above using primary data, which would likely reveal even greater CO2e savings! We’ll also be conducting carbon lifecycle analysis on our new baked kibble compared with meat-based alternatives, plus a full analysis of the environmental impact of our packaging, with a view to improving this even further. 

Longer term, we plan to increase usage of ‘green’ electricity in all aspects of the production process, exploring the generation of electricity on-site with green technology. We also want to increase our use of Zero Emissions Transport companies that use electric vehicles, look to source ingredients more locally and avoid, wherever possible, using non-European supplies. 

As always, we welcome ideas and input from you on what we could be doing better. So please do drop us a peemail at woof@thepackpet.com and let us know your thoughts!  

If you want to discover more about raising a happy, healthy plant-based dog, download our FREE eBook 

Fancy Switching Your Dog Over To THE PACK?

You can try THE PACK’s Oven Backed Crunchy Feast in a 100g sample size or go all in and stock up with their 5kg bag.

If you want to try our sample size we recommend you use code FREESHIPPING to get free delivery, meaning you can try this groundbreaking food for just £2.99!

Or you can get 30% off their 5kg bag with code WELCOME30, meaning you can save £15 and purchase the 5kg size for just £34.99, giving your dog week after week of delicious, nutritious meals to chomp on.

Or you can get our 12 Can Multipack Of Wet Food for just £27.99.

Winner, winner plant-based dinner!


Older Post

Leave a comment